The Post-Gazette’s treatment of Black reporters who have been pulled from the coverage of the Black Lives Matter movement underscores why we all should care about this — and gives some clues for what we must do.

Pittsburgh already has so few Black journalists, and many who are here say they feel mistreated, left out and stuck in dead-end careers.

Look at the research from Columbia University’s Tow Center for Digital Journalism. In a still fresh report that came out in October, Black journalists in Pittsburgh described what it’s like to work here. It’s not easy. Listen to what they said:

  • “I felt like the token at that paper. I felt like I was buried, and my work was buried in one section of the paper. I was rarely on the front page of the paper, and I felt like when I tried to do more, I was smacked back to that [less prestigious section].”
  • “In Pittsburgh, I felt very much in a box. I felt like I was fighting my bosses and [fellow] staff at the same time, and I was exhausted.”
  • “It’s almost like you had to be really exceptional [if you were black] … some people didn’t get the same kind of encouragement. It’s not [that] talent is not recognized, but there did seem to be a difference between the type of encouragement and mentoring you might get between white and black staffers.”

Now, with those words fresh in your mind, think about what happened to Alexis Johnson, a Black reporter at the Post-Gazette who was told she could no longer cover the Black Lives Matter movement because she posted this funny tweet about white people making a mess at the annual Kenny Chesney concert.

When the Tow Center report came out, I asked some black journalists what I could do. They asked me to speak out. When Black journalists talk about the challenges they face — as they have done in this city for years — they told me it sounds like they are whining or “playing the race card.”

When white people, with our privilege, speak out about these problems, it lifts up Black voices by saying, yes, I see a problem here, too.

The Post-Gazette’s editors were wrong to remove Johnson from covering Black Lives Matter because of her tweet. Her comment resonated with the thousands of people who retweeted it because it was honest, not because it revealed some secret bias or agenda.

Besides, journalists do this. They develop a cynicism and a sense of humor to deal with the unusual, and often horrific, situations they have to cover. That doesn’t mean they cannot tell a story honestly and completely.

The Post-Gazette’s Managing Editor Karen Kane told me via email that she cannot comment on the situation involving Johnson or any of the related events that followed because it involves personnel matters. UPDATE 6/10: The Post-Gazette published an open letter on June 10 about this matter saying it was not based on race. Read it in full here. 

The Tow report on Pittsburgh’s lack of media diversity also pointed out that Black journalists in Pittsburgh often feel isolated in their newsrooms, like their colleagues do not fully accept them. That’s what makes what happened at the Post-Gazette remarkable. After managers silenced Johnson, dozens of her colleagues spoke out in support of her publicly, using the social media hashtag #IStandWithAlexis, and retweeting her original funny tweet. The hashtag started trending on Twitter in Pittsburgh.

But there’s more. The Post-Gazette editors barred a Black photographer, Michael Santiago, who tweeted support for Johnson from covering the Black Lives Matter movement, according to the Newspaper Guild of Pittsburgh. Then two protest-related articles written by other journalists who supported Johnson were removed from the newspaper’s website before being restored in unbylined and heavily edited versions.

From the Guild: “Protest-related stories by two staffers — city hall reporter Ashley Murray and general assignment reporter Lauren Lee — suddenly disappeared without explanation from the PG’s website shortly after they tweeted support for Alexis. Ashley and Lauren were baffled, and queries to management were met with silence. To us, the cause and effect is clear.” Read the full Guild statement here.

The story was picked up by The Washington Post and the Associated Press and is inspiring tweets like this from the National Association of Black Journalists:

“The PG’s latest assault on our union is possibly the worst yet because it strikes at the very heart of journalism: truth and transparency,” the union wrote in an online statement. “Guild leaders are not entirely sure yet what is happening, but we are dedicated to finding out and correcting it.”